Posts Tagged ‘Yi Lu’

THE STOOL PIGEON a.k.a. THE BEAST STALKER 2 [SIN YAN | XIAN REN | 铫人]

2010/09/09

http://www.emp.hk/

http://www.facebook.com/EmperorMotionPictures

HONG KONG 2010  Directed by: Dante Lam  Written by: Dante Lam, Wai Lun Ng  Produced by: Candy Leung, Dai Song, Zhongjun Wang, Albert Yeung  Cinematography by: Chong-To Tse  Editing by: Ki-Hop Chan, Matthew Hui  Music by: Henry Lai Cast: Nick Cheung, Nicholas Tse, Lunmei Kwai, Kai Chi Liu, Yi Lu, Pu Miao, Yi Lu, Sherman Chung, Deep Ng, Philip Keung, Jing-Hung Kwok, Shing-Cheung Lee, Rob Lok, Yeung Ming Wan

It’s getting a wee bit too obvious now that Dante Lam remakes his one script time and again; had there not been THE SNIPER in between THE BEST STALKER and FIRE OF CONSCIENCE (as well as THE STOOL PIGEON), we would have noticed that probably earlier: THE STOOL PIGEON follows the outline of FIRE OF CONSCIENCE faithfully and mimics quite a few elements of THE BEAST STALKER.

The good news is that even on a bad day Dante Lam, in his current form, can outstrip most of Hong Kong’s crime dramas: just like its predecessor, THE STOOL PIGEON approximates the works of Michael Mann, taking its story about cops and robbers to the mean streets of Kowloon and the grim world of organized crime. Nick Cheung plays inspector Don who frequently uses informants (so-called stool pigeons) willing to rat others out for money. The problem with that is the informants are a volatile, and dangerous, species that cannot easily be trusted, while on the other hand they are living in constant fear for their lives due to their cooperation with the police.

When Don learns about a jewelry heist that will go down shortly, he tries to infiltrate the gang lead by a notorious criminal called Barbarian to prevent the worst. Ghost Jr., an ex-con and underground racing ace, seems to be the right choice to be Don’s stool pigeon for this mission, but what Don doesn’t know is that Ghost Jr. has some serious issues to deal with, including a sister who works as a prostitute to clear the family’s debt. But once things are set in motion there is no turning back and everyone gets dragged through what’s probably the most heinous experience of his/her life.

Dante Lam has meticulously organized his story universe: the characterization, the motivations, the interwoven plot threads, the duel between the seemingly good, the bad and the ugly, all that is well thought-out, very well scripted and flawlessly filmed. Some even rush to the judgment that Nick Cheung and Nicholas Tse both deliver their best performances so far, just as the movie has been hailed as this year’s best Hong Kong movie and safe award winner. Yet, I wouldn’t fully agree (the movie will probably win awards though). Despite the script being somewhat too clinical for my taste there is basically nothing much to complain about, but to put things in perspective let’s have another look at FIRE OF CONSCIENCE without indulging the pleasures of side-by-side comparisons too much.

For one thing, THE STOOL PIGEON lacks originality as FIRE was there first. Then, I feel that FIRE OF CONSCIENCE always found the sweet spot: its action, violence, emotions and gripping drama were taken to the edge, but never beyond that point. In comparison, THE STOOL PIGEON often seems exaggerated and as a result less believable; it’s like Mr. Lam forgot when to stop, when enough is enough. More than once the actors are forced to exceed their capabilities: the line they are crossing may be thin, but it’s there. Their discomfort is noticeable, just as some side plots are clearly taken too far. THE STOOL PIGEON is losing focus and is drifting away sometimes at the expense of the action as well as the film’s overall intensity. Too much is going on, and too little of that contributes to character or story development.

That doesn’t mean that it’s not appreciable to see a rather complex story laid out in front of us amid an overwhelming amount of McScripts, but we should also not forget that complexity must not distract from the intrinsic conflict and the morale the tale aims to tell. I believe FIRE OF CONSCIENCE did a better job in staying very close to its protagonists and its deeper insights of the human condition; all along the way however it threw in many complications for texture without disrupting the flow of the film or its impact.

It would be a preposterous demand to ask for a more stringent script next time as we must be thankful for what Mr. Lam has achieved recently, but there can be no doubt that THE STOOL PIGEON is losing momentum here and there, is getting too talkative at times and overall misses punch. THE STOOL PIGEON is anything but suave, but it’s like all characters are set on a collision course and then make a lot of detours before finally clashing.

Despite the honorable attempt to excel FIRE OF CONSCIENCE Mr. Lam’s THE STOOL PIGEON is more detached from its characters and their perceived realities (which were the key driver for their actions): while it is still a superior thriller, gripping drama and fast-paced action movie THE STOOL PIGEON suffers from the filmmaker’s dilemma to either produce a carbon copy of a great predecessor or to throw it all overboard and start anew. Mr. Lam couldn’t decide, and as a result is trying too hard to be more diverse, more intelligent and necessarily different without really improving his well-crafted formula.

THE STOOL PIGEON, while standing out as clearly above-average thriller, is a variation on a strong theme that is falling behind its own aspirations.

J.


Advertisements

AFTERSHOCKS a.k.a. AFTERSHOCK [TANGSHAN DADIZHEN | 唐山大地震]

2010/08/26

http://www.mediaasia.com/aftershock

CHINA 2010  Directed by: Xiaogang Feng Book: Zhang Ling Written by: Su Xiaowei Production: Hua Yi Bros.  Cinematography by: Yue Lu  Editing by: Xiao Yang  Music: Li-Guang Wang  Cast: Zhang Jingchu, Daoming Chen, Yi Lu, Jin Chen, Fan Xu, Chen Li, Zi-Feng Zhang, Ziwen Wang, Lixin Yang, Li-Li Liu, Mei Yong, Tie-Dan, Guoqiang Zhang, Zhong Lu

How do you dramatize a disaster that has actually happened? It probably depends on how interested you actually are. How much you care.

AFTERSHOCKS is honest cinema that has little to do with special effects orgies. The film instead chooses to deal with the decisions a catastrophe like the earthquake of Tangshan forces upon people, and how this incident affects everyone’s life in the long run. AFTERSHOCKS spends very little time on the earthquake itself, and why would it: it happened, and it is non-negotiable. There’s little that needs to be dramatized, or stylized for that matter (although the moment of the quake certainly leaves an impression). A dialogue later on reveals a crucial point: you don’t need to run from a small earthquake as no damage will be done, and you also don’t need to run from a very serious quake as you can’t escape anyway.

AFTERSHOCKS has understood that very well and consequently avoids any of the familiar disaster film clichés. What’s more important for the movie are the scars the quake leaves on people, the impact it has on their lives. The English title AFTERSHOCKS is very befitting, because life after the earthquake is no longer like life before. The disaster is hour zero, and everything after that is a very long aftershock that rocks the foundation of people’s very existence. For decades, smaller and larger shock waves will bring back not-so-fond memories and raise uncomfortable questions. Tangshan knows.

AFTERSHOCKS tries to fathom how the earthquake distorts reality, how it makes a family drift as the father dies, the mother is made to choose which of their two kids to save and the daughter who is believed to be dead is separated from the family for decades and grows up with step parents. It may only be one story of many, but like so often, if told well it can represent the story of them all.

AFTERSHOCKS succeeds in telling its story without complication or tricks, it speaks to us, personally involves us in the suffering we see. AFTERSHOCKS presses all the right buttons (not to say that was its objective): sometimes it observes, but is also very cinematic, sometimes it’s dramatic, but also authentic. AFTERSHOCKS respects the characters and their story at all times (a rarely seen integrity), but it nevertheless manages not to bore the audience (I wouldn’t want to call it „manages to entertain”). On the contrary, with increasing running time you’ll forget the time.

The ending may seem like a frequently seen happy end, but it is consistent and perhaps a necessity. After all that we have witnessed and gone through for more than two hours, any other denouement would be intolerable. And the way AFTERSHOCKS unwinds the threads isn’t fatuous by any means, but in fact perfectly rounds off the film.

Talking about perfection: many years ago we admired the aestheticism of Zhang Yimou, while today China’s far away from its heyday as a film nation. It is noteworthy however that AFTERSHOCKS is an extraordinarily sophisticated, detailed, precise and simply impressive film, a film so elegant and beautiful that most of what comes from Hong Kong (and elsewhere) fades in comparison.

AFTERSHOCKS is one of the most important Chinese films of the year, and I can only hope that more producers and directors will abandon political propaganda or purely commercial interests in the future and instead tell touching, relevant stories that have the power to move and deeply affect audiences far beyond the borders of the People’s Republic, just like AFTERSHOCKS does.

J.

DIM SUM: AFTERSHOCK a.k.a. AFTERSHOCKS [TANG SHAN DA DI ZHEN | 唐山大地震 ]

2010/07/26

http://www.mediaasia.com/aftershock/

UPDATE! READ THE FULL REVIEW HERE! – – – – – – – – China’s latest disaster movie is not so much an apocalyptic fantasy a la Emmerich, but a semi-realistic account of real events: AFTERSHOCK dramatizes the 1976 Tangshan earthquake, which killed 300,000 people. The movie is directed by Xiaogang Feng and stars Daoming Chen, Jingchu Zhang, Yi Lu and Fan Xu.

J.